Burgess v. Social Security Administration, No. 6:2016cv00105 - Document 31 (E.D. Okla. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West granting 30 Motion for Relief(sjr, Chambers)
Download PDF
Burgess v. Social Security Administration Doc. 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RHONDA K. BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-16-105-KEW OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before this Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) filed by Timothy M. White, counsel for Plaintiff (Docket Entry #30). Counsel requests an extension of time under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 to file a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) because he has not yet received a copy of the agency award upon which the request would be based. Counsel requests he be allowed until 60 days after receiving the Notice of Award to file a § 406(b) motion. This Court sympathizes with counsel’s quandary created by the unique procedure under Social Security law which does not neatly fit within the normal requirements of civil procedure. counsel has employed the appropriate method for seeking obtaining an extension under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493, 505 (10th Cir. 2006). Clearly, and McGraw v. The timeliness in filing the motion for attorney fees will be gauged upon the standard of reasonableness, which certainly will encompass the time required to obtain a copy of the award. While a Rule 60(b) request can be combined with the § 406(b) motion in most instances, the filing of a separate extension motion Dockets.Justia.com may be required in instances where a significant delay in obtaining the award occurs. As with most areas of the law, a hard and fast rule is not entirely possible and counsel will have to evaluate each case separately for their particular circumstance. In this case, this Court Plaintiff on March 31, 2017. entered judgment in favor of Counsel received notice of a fully favorable decision from Defendant dated October 25, 2017. Counsel is on notice to be seeking the notice of award and should file his attorney fee motion under § 406(b) as soon as possible after receipt of the Notice. While counsel requests 60 days after receiving the Notice within which to file his fee request, this Court finds 30 days to be a more reasonable time to require the filing of the § 406(b) request. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) filed by Timothy M. White, Plaintiff’s counsel (Docket Entry #30) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff’s counsel shall file his motion for attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice of award. Counsel shall make every effort to obtain the notice as soon as possible so that the delay is not considered unreasonable. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of November, 2017. ______________________________ KIMBERLY E. WEST UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.