Kincaid v. Social Security Administration, No. 6:2015cv00385 - Document 32 (E.D. Okla. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER Awarding Attorney's Fees to the Plaintiff Under the EAJA by Magistrate Judge Steven P. Shreder granting in part 28 Motion for Attorney Fees by Laura Kincaid, to the extent that the Government is ordered to pay the agreed-upon fee award (Re: 31 Stipulation). (ndd, Deputy Clerk)
Download PDF
Kincaid v. Social Security Administration Doc. 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA LAURA KINCAID, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,1 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-15-385-SPS OPINION AND ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES TO THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE EAJA Plaintiff Laura Kincaid was the prevailing party in this action under the Social Security Act. Plaintiff originally sought an award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,128.20, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). See Docket No. 28. The Commissioner subsequently filed a response, titled “Stipulated Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act,” indicating that the parties had agreed to an award of $4,500. See Docket No. 31. Upon review of the record herein, the Court finds that the agreed amount is reasonable and that the Commissioner should be ordered to pay it to the Plaintiff as the prevailing party herein. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (“Except as otherwise specifically provided by statute, a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the 1 On January 23, 2017, Nancy A. Berryhill became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Ms. Berryhill is substituted for Carolyn Colvin as the Defendant in this action. Dockets.Justia.com United States fees and other expenses, in addition to any costs awarded pursuant to subsection (a), incurred by that party in any civil action (other than cases sounding in tort)[.]”); see also Manning v. Astrue, 510 F.3d 1246, 1251 (10th Cir. 2007) (“The EAJA therefore permits attorney’s fees reimbursement to financially eligible prevailing parties, who make a proper application, and not to their attorneys.”). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion and Brief in Support for an Award of for Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. §2412 [Docket No. 28] is GRANTED IN PART, to the extent that the Government is hereby ordered to pay the agreed-upon $4,500.00 fee award to the Plaintiff as the prevailing party herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the Plaintiff’s attorney is subsequently awarded any fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), said attorney shall refund the smaller amount of such fees to the Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). DATED this 12th day of July, 2017. -2-