Burney v. Social Security Administration, No. 6:2013cv00342 - Document 30 (E.D. Okla. 2016)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West : Granting 29 Motion for Relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.60(b)(6). (acg, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
Burney v. Social Security Administration Doc. 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MERVIN L. BURNEY, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-13-342-KEW OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before this Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) filed by Timothy M. White, counsel for Plaintiff, on January 27, 2016 (Docket Entry #29). Counsel requests an extension of time under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 to file a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) because he has not yet received a copy of the agency award upon which the request would be based. Counsel requests he be allowed until 30 days after receiving the Notice of Award to file a § 406(b) motion. Defendant did not file an objection to the request. This Court sympathizes with counsel’s quandary created by the unique procedure under Social Security law which does not neatly fit within the normal requirements of civil procedure. counsel has employed the appropriate method for seeking obtaining an extension under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493, 505 (10th Cir. 2006). Clearly, and McGraw v. The timeliness in filing the motion for attorney fees will be gauged upon the standard of reasonableness, which certainly will encompass the time required to obtain a copy of the award. Dockets.Justia.com While a Rule 60(b) request can be combined with the § 406(b) motion in most instances, the filing of a separate extension motion may be required in instances where a significant delay in obtaining the award occurs. As with most areas of the law, a hard and fast rule is not entirely possible and counsel will have to evaluate each case separately for their particular circumstance. In this case, this Court entered judgment on March 30, 2015. Counsel received notice of a fully Defendant dated January 13, 2016. favorable decision from Counsel is on notice to be seeking the notice of award and should file his attorney fee motion under § 406(b) as soon as possible after receipt of the Notice. This Court finds counsel’s request to file his fee motion within 30 days of receipt of the award to be reasonable. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) filed by Timothy M. White, Plaintiff’s counsel, on January 27, 2016 (Docket Entry #29) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff’s counsel shall file his motion for attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice of award. Counsel shall make every effort to obtain the notice as soon as possible so that the delay is not considered unreasonable. IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of February, 2016. ______________________________ KIMBERLY E. WEST UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.