Williams v. Wilkinson, No. 6:2013cv00206 - Document 60 (E.D. Okla. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White directing defendants to file a response within 30 days to the remanded issues (re: 58 ). Plaintiff granted 30 days to file a reply to defendant's response, if appropriate. (neh, Deputy Clerk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Williams v. Wilkinson Doc. 60 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MARIO WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. TIM WILKINSON and BRIAN WIDEMAN, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV 13-206-RAW-SPS OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff appealed the Opinion and Order dismissing this action to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. The appellate court reversed and remanded for further proceedings concerning Plaintiff’s (1) communal-services RLUIPA and First Amendment claims, (2) Kosher-diet RLUIPA and First Amendment claims, (3) motion for appointment of counsel, (4) motion for class certification, and (5) motion for preliminary injunction. Williams v. Wilkinson, No. 15-7022, slip op. at 32 (10th Cir. Apr. 14, 2016) (Dkt. 58). ACCORDINGLY, the defendants are directed to file within thirty (30) days a response to the remanded issues. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days to file a reply to the defendants’ response, if appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of May 2016. Dated this 26th day of May, 2016. J4h4i0 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
