Womack v. Jones et al, No. 6:2012cv00399 - Document 20 (E.D. Okla. 2013)
Court Description: AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay, denying certificate of appealability(acg, Deputy Clerk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA BRYAN DEAN WOMACK, Petitioner, v. JUSTIN JONES, DOC Director, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV 12-399-FHS-KEW CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY On June 14, 2013, the court dismissed petitioner s petition for a writ of habeas corpus as barred by the statute of limitations (Docket No. 16). After a careful review of the record, the court concludes petitioner has not shown at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether [this] court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). See also 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c). ACCORDINGLY, petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. See Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of June, 2013.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
