Burnett v. Miller et al, No. 6:2012cv00158 - Document 217 (E.D. Okla. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White directing defendants to file a response within 21 days to the remanded issue (re: 213 ). Plaintiff granted 21 days to file a reply to defendant's response, if appropriate. (Re: 213 USCA Decision ) (neh, Deputy Clerk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Burnett v. Miller et al Doc. 217 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA STEPHEN CRAIG BURNETT, Plaintiff, v. KATHY MILLER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV 12-158-RAW-SPS OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff appealed the Opinion and Order dismissing this action to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. The appellate court reversed and remanded for further proceedings concerning Plaintiff’s claim of unconstitutional conditions in the medical cell. Burnett v. Miller, No. 14-7069, slip op. at 20-21 (10th Cir. Nov. 20, 2015) (Dkt. 213). ACCORDINGLY, the defendants are directed to file within twenty-one (21) days a response to the remanded issue. Plaintiff is granted twenty-one (21) days to file a reply to the defendants’ response, if appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of May 2016. Dated this 26th day of May, 2016. J4h4i0 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
