Lowe v. Social Security Administration, No. 6:2010cv00242 - Document 27 (E.D. Okla. 2011)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven P. Shreder granting 25 Motion for Attorney Fees (dma, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA STEVEN R. LOWE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-10-242-SPS ) ) ) ) ) ) OPINION AND ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY S FEES TO THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE EAJA Plaintiff Steven R. Lowe was the prevailing party in this action under the Social Security Act. Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney fees in the amount of $6,094.80, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The Commissioner does not object to the fee award. Upon review of the record herein, the Court finds that said amount is reasonable and that the Commissioner should be ordered to pay it to the Plaintiff as the prevailing party herein. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) ( Except as otherwise specifically provided by statute, a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States fees and other expenses, in addition to any costs awarded pursuant to subsection (a), incurred by that party in any civil action (other than cases sounding in tort)[.] ); see also Manning v. Astrue, 510 F.3d 1246, 1251 (10th Cir. 2007) ( The EAJA therefore permits attorney s fees reimbursement to financially eligible prevailing parties, who make a proper application, and not to their attorneys. ). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff s Motion and Brief in Support For an Award of Attorney s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412 [Docket No. 25] is hereby granted and that the Government is hereby ordered to pay the above-referenced amount to the Plaintiff as the prevailing party herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the Plaintiff s attorney is subsequently awarded any fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), said attorney shall refund the smaller amount of such fees to the Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). DATED this 12th day of October, 2011. -- 2 --

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.