Fields v. Social Security Administration, No. 6:2007cv00395 - Document 27 (E.D. Okla. 2012)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay granting 25 Motion for Attorney Fees(trl, Chambers)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ELANE M. FIELDS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security Administration Defendant. No. CIV-07-395-FHS-KEW OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff s counsel filed a Motion For Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Dkt. No. 25) on January 26, 2012. Judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiff on February 10, 2009, remanding this action to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the Commissioner issued a fully favorable decision on May 3, 2011, finding Plaintiff has been under a disability as defined in the Social Security Act since February 24, 2004. On November 27, 2011, a Notice of Award was issued in favor of Plaintiff with an award of back benefits in the amount of $88,025.00. On December 13, 2011, Plaintiff s counsel received the Notice of Award. Attorney fees are awardable under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) when a social security claimant is awarded disability following a remand from a federal district court. Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493, (10th 496 Cir. 2006). benefits McGraw v. In such circumstances, the fourteen-day period running from the date of judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(2)(B)(i) will have expired and 1 claimants, through counsel, rely on Rule 60(b)(6) to seek such fees well after the expiration of the fourteen-day period. at 505. Id. The McGraw Court noted that [a] motion for an award of fees under § 406(b)(1) should be filed within a reasonable time of the Commissioner s decision awarding benefits. Id. On May 26, 2011, the Court entered an Opinion and Order (Dkt. No. 24) granting Plaintiff s counsel s Motion for Relief Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) and authorizing counsel to file his motion for fees under § 406(b)(1) within sixty days of his receipt of the Notice of Award containing the calculation of Plaintiff s past-due benefits. In doing so, the Court noted that the decision awarding benefits language referenced by the McGraw Court necessarily includes not only the favorable decision on disability, but the actual award of past-due benefits. Plaintiff s counsel received the Notice of Award on December 13, 2011. Counsel s motion filed on January 26, 2012 - forty-four days from the December 13, 2011, receipt of the Notice of Award is therefore timely. Plaintiff s counsel has moved the Court to approve an attorney fee award under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) in the amount of $16,006.25 for counsel s representation of Plaintiff before the Court. Counsel s requested fees do not exceed either the amount contracted for in the parties contingency agreement or the 25% limitation of section 406(b). Neither the Commissioner nor the Plaintiff have presented any objection to Plaintiff s counsel s request for fees in the amount of $16,006.25. The Commissioner has filed an informative response on the various points of law to be considered, but has declined to take reasonableness of counsel s fee request. 2 a position on the Plaintiff has indicated in a document entitled Notice To Plaintiff (Exhibit C to Dkt. No. 25) that she has no objection to the attorney fees requested by her counsel. the record, The Court has conducted an independent review of including the contingency-fee contract between counsel and Plaintiff, and counsel s documented time records, and concludes counsel s motion is timely and that the requested attorney fee amount of $16,006.25 is reasonable under the facts and circumstances of this case given the nature and quality of the representation and the results achieved. See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 807-809 (2002). Consequently, Plaintiff s counsel s Motion For Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Dkt. No. 25) is granted in the amount of $16,006.25. Pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986), Plaintiff's counsel is directed to refund to Plaintiff previously awarded the under smaller the amount Equal of Access fees to ($3,607.80) Justice ( EAJA ), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). It is so ordered this 21st day of February, 2012. 3 Act
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
