Kibler v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2021cv00339 - Document 11 (S.D. Ohio 2022)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties' Joint Motion for Remand (Doc. No. 10 ) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiffs favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties' Motion; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 6/27/22. (pb)

Download PDF
Kibler v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON SARA K., CaseNo.3:21-cv-00339 District Judge Walter H. Rice Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. DECISION AND ENTRY This Social Security case is presently before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion for Remand.(Doc. 10.) The parties agree that this Court should enter a judgment in favor of Plaintiff, reversing the Commissioner's decision under Sentence Four of Section 205 ofthe Social Security Act,42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remanding the cause to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with this motion. The parties further agree that upon remand,the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge's decision. The Commissioner will develop the administrative record as necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, hold a new hearing, and issue a new decision. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties' Joint Motion for Remand(Doc. No. 10) is ACCEPTED; Dockets.Justia.com 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiffs favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties' Motion; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: f, kLS^\( Walter H. Rice United States District Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.