Grieco v. Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women, No. 3:2021cv00193 - Document 19 (S.D. Ohio 2021)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING 18 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 8/13/2021. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Grieco v. Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women Doc. 19 Case: 3:21-cv-00193-TMR-MRM Doc #: 19 Filed: 08/13/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 210 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JESSICA LYNN GRIECO, Petitioner, : - vs - Case No. 3:21-cv-193 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz TERI BALDAUF, Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women, : Respondent. DECISION AND ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING This habeas corpus case is before the Court on the Petitioner’s second Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing (ECF No. 18). In denying her first Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (ECF No. 14), the Court wrote: However, the Supreme Court of the United States has interpreted the AEDPA to prohibit evidentiary hearings in § 2254 cases until and unless the petitioner has established under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2) that the state court’s decision is based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of evidence presented to those state courts. Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170 (2011). Accordingly, Petitioner’s Motion for Evidentiary hearing is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal if the requirements of Pinholster are met. (Order, ECF No. 17). Although she cites Pinholster in her current motion, Petitioner has in no way yet satisfied the Pinholster standard of showing that the state courts made unreasonable 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case: 3:21-cv-00193-TMR-MRM Doc #: 19 Filed: 08/13/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 211 determinations of fact based on the evidence before them. Although the Court has ordered production of the State Court Record, that has not yet occurred and is not due until September 20, 2021 (ECF No. 9). The Court cannot possibly evaluate the state courts’ determinations of fact until the record has been filed. Petitioner’s second Motion for Evidentiary Hearing is therefore DENIED. August 13, 2021. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
