Bey et al v. Lewis et al, No. 3:2021cv00179 - Document 14 (S.D. Ohio 2021)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Defendant David D. Brannon's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 7 ) be GRANTED; 3. Defendants Jenny M. Lewis, Beth Hutter, Dennis J. Percy, Michael Jarvis, Barbara Duhon and Michael Woodford 9;s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10 ) be GRANTED; and 4. Plaintiffs Aladdin Moroc Bey and Luna LaToya Bey's Complaint (Doc. No. 1) be DISMISSED in its entirety, WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendant Brannon, and WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the remaining Defendants. 5. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/15/21. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bey et al v. Lewis et al Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON ALADDIN MOROC BEY,et al.. Case No. 3:21-cv-179 District Judge Walter H. Rice Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington Plaintiffs, vs. JENNY M.LEWIS, Defendants. DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington(Doc. No. 13), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections, if any, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), has expired, this Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on October 21, 2021 (Doc. No. 13)is ADOPTED in full; 2. Defendant David D. Brannon's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 7)be GRANTED; 3. Defendants Jenny M. Lewis, Beth Hutter, Dennis J. Percy, Michael Jarvis, Barbara Duhon and Michael Woodford's Motion to Dismiss(Doc. No. 10)be GRANTED;and 4. Plaintiffs Aladdin Moroc Bey and Luna LaToya Bey's Complaint(Doc. No. 1)be DISMISSED in its entirety, WITH Dockets.Justia.com PREJUDICE as to Defendant Brannon, and WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the remaining Defendants. 5. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date; I I- Walter H. Rice United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
