Costlow v. ODRC (Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections) et al, No. 3:2021cv00043 - Document 23 (S.D. Ohio 2021)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY - Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It therefore is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on December 1, 2021 (Doc. No. 22 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Defendants Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections and the State of Ohios Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 11 ) is GRANTED; 3. Defendants Dayton Correctional Institution, Beverly Clayton and Dr. Rosalind Moores Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 15 ) is GRANTED; 4. Plaintiffs Motion to Remove and Replace (Doc. No. 20 ) isGRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and 5. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12/21/21. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Costlow v. ODRC (Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections) et al Doc. 23 Case: 3:21-cv-00043-TMR-SLO Doc #: 23 Filed: 12/21/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 181 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON KAREN COSTLOW, : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff, vs. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS, et al., Case No. 3:21-cv-00043 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington Defendants. DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. No. 22), to whom this case originally was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections, if any, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, this Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It therefore is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on December 1, 2021 (Doc. No. 22) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Defendants’ Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections and the State of Ohio’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED; 3. Defendants’ Dayton Correctional Institution, Beverly Clayton and Dr. Rosalind Moore’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED; Dockets.Justia.com Case: 3:21-cv-00043-TMR-SLO Doc #: 23 Filed: 12/21/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 182 4. Plaintiff’s Motion to Remove and Replace (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and 5. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. December 21, 2021 s/Thomas M. Rose Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.