Lankford v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al, No. 3:2020mc00001 - Document 15 (S.D. Ohio 2020)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY - It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Reports and Recommendations (ECF Nos. 2 , 12 ) are ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiffs Motion to Enforce Arbitration Award and Motion to Issue an Emergency Injunctive Stay to Reestablish Posse ssion of Property (ECF No. 1 ) i s DENIED; 3. Plaintiffs Motion to Withdraw Motion to Enforce Arbitration Award Without Prejudice (ECF No. 3 ), Amended Motion for Arbitration Award (ECF. No. [4)], and Motion to Withdraw (ECF. No. 8 ) are DENIED; 4. Defendants Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award (ECF No. [7)] is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 5. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Michael J. Newman on 11/20/2020. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Lankford v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al Doc. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON DONALD K. LANKFORD, Plaintiff, vs. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 3:20-mc-00001 District Judge Michael J. Newman Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has reviewed the Reports and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (ECF. Nos. 2, 12), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Reports and Recommendations (ECF Nos. 2, 12) are ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Arbitration Award and Motion to Issue an Emergency Injunctive Stay to Reestablish Possession of Property (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; 3. Plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw Motion to Enforce Arbitration Award Without Prejudice (ECF No. 3), Amended Motion for Arbitration Award (ECF. No. 4), and Motion to Withdraw (ECF. No. 8) are DENIED; 4. Defendants’ Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 5. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Date: November 20, 2020 s/ Michael J. Newman Michael J. Newman United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.