Cline v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2020cv00128 - Document 21 (S.D. Ohio 2021)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Commissioners non-disability finding is vacated; 2. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff Erin L. Cline was under a disability within the meaning of t he Social Security Act; 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the Report and Recommendations; and 4. The case be terminated on the Courts docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 8/3/21. (pb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cline v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 21 Case: 3:20-cv-00128-TMR-PBS Doc #: 21 Filed: 08/04/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 813 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON ERIN L. CLINE, Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 3:20-cv-128 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. (Doc. #20), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Commissioner’s non-disability finding is vacated; 2. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff Erin L. Cline was under a “disability” within the meaning of the Social Security Act; 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the Report and Recommendations; and 4. The case be terminated on the Court’s docket. August 3, 2021 s/Thomas M. Rose Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
