Alston et al v. Plummer, No. 3:2018cv00247 - Document 47 (S.D. Ohio 2018)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION IN LIMINE TO ADMIT THE REPORT OF CGL COMPANIES AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE PURSUANT TOFEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 803(8)(A)(iii) (DOC. # 40 )- During the conference call, counsel fo r Defendant stipulated to the authenticity of this Report and indicated that she had no objections to Plaintiffs' use of the Report at the Preliminary Injunction Hearing. She did, however, reserve the right to object with respect to its relevanc y. In addition, she noted that Defendant did not stipulate to the authenticity or admissibility of the slides and email messages related to the Report. This was to be the subject of further discussions between counsel and will be revisited during the conference call scheduled for 4:00 p.m. on November 29, 2018.. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/28/18. (kma)

Download PDF
Alston et al v. Plummer Doc. 47 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.