Sayger v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2018cv00244 - Document 11 (S.D. Ohio 2019)

Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER granting 10 Joint Motion to Remand. 1. The parties' Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner 10 is ACCEPTED, 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff's favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, 3. Thi s matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties' stipulation; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3-11-2019. (de)

Download PDF
Sayger v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON HEATHER SAYGER, Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. : Case No. 3:18-cv-244 : : District Judge Thomas M. Rose : Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : : : : : DECISION AND ENTRY This social security case is presently before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner. (Doc. #10). The parties stipulate that this case should be remanded to the Acting Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge’s decision, and the Commissioner will conduct further proceedings and develop the administrative record as necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is under a disability as defined by the Social Security Act. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties’ Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. #10) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff’s favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; Dockets.Justia.com 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties’ stipulation; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: March 11, 2019 *s/Thomas M. Rose Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.