Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2018cv00099 - Document 11 (S.D. Ohio 2018)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY -The parties' Joint Stipulation to Remand to the Commissioner 10 is ACCEPTED; the Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff's favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; this matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties' stipulation; and the case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9-28-2018. (de)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON CLIFTON B. WOODS, Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. : Case No. 3:18-cv-99 : : District Judge Thomas M. Rose : Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : : : : : DECISION AND ENTRY This social security case is presently before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Remand to the Commissioner. (Doc. #10). The parties stipulate that the findings of the ALJ including the non-disability finding below should be vacated and this matter remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon receipt of this Order, the Appeals Council will remand the matter to an Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings. During said proceedings, the Administrative Law Judge will reweigh the medical opinions and reevaluate Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties’ Joint Stipulation to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. #10) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff’s favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; Dockets.Justia.com 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties’ stipulation; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: September 28, 2018 *s/Thomas M. Rose Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
