Helterbrand v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2017cv00122 - Document 9 (S.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY - The parties' Joint Motion to Remand 8 is ACCEPTED, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff's favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, this matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuan t to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties' stipulation; and the case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9/25/2017. (de)

Download PDF
Helterbrand v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JAMES D. HELTERBRAND, Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. : Case No. 3:17-cv-122 : : District Judge Thomas M. Rose : Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : : : : : : DECISION AND ENTRY This case is presently before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand. (Doc. #8). The parties stipulate and petition this Court to order remand of this case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to enter judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Upon remand, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge’s decision. The Commissioner will conduct further proceedings and develop the administrative record as necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, including offering Plaintiff a new hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, and then issue a new decision. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties’ Joint Motion to Remand (Doc. #8) is ACCEPTED; Dockets.Justia.com 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff’s favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties’ stipulation; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: September 25, 2017 *s/Thomas M. Rose Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.