Day v. DeLong et al, No. 3:2016cv00437 - Document 50 (S.D. Ohio 2018)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVINGTON 47 , OVERRULING DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 48 , AND DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 30 . Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 1-10-2018. (de)

Download PDF
Day v. DeLong et al Doc. 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON Jeffery Day, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:16-cv-437 Judge Thomas M. Rose v. Kim DeLong, et al., Defendants. DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVINGTON (DOC. 47), OVERRULING DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE=S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, (DOC. 48), AND DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. (DOC. 30). The instant action brings claims of constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and various state law claims. (Doc. 1). Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Objections to Magistrate Judge Sharon Ovington’s Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 48). The Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington, (Doc. 47), recommends that the Court deny Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (Doc. 30). As required by 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that Defendants’ objections, (Doc. 48), to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendations, (Doc. 47), are not well taken and they are hereby OVERRULED. Wherefore, the Court ADOPTS IN FULL the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 47). Defendants’ Motion for Dockets.Justia.com Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 30) is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED this Wednesday, January 10, 2018. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.