Hatfield v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2016cv00407 - Document 11 (S.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY - The parties' Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner 10 is ACCEPTED, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff's favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. The matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Adm inistration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties' stipulation; and the case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 5-17-2017. (de)
Download PDF
Hatfield v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON HERBERT HATFIELD, Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. : Case No. 3:16-cv-407 : : District Judge Thomas M. Rose : Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : : : : : : DECISION AND ENTRY This social security case is presently before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand. (Doc. #10). The parties stipulate and petition this Court to order remand of this case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to enter judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Upon remand, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge’s decision. The Commissioner will conduct further proceedings, offer Plaintiff a supplemental hearing and develop the administrative record as necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, and then issue a new decision. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties’ Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. #10) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff’s favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; Dockets.Justia.com 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties’ stipulation; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: May 17, 2017 *s/Thomas M. Rose Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge 2