Williams v. Ohio Department of Rehab and Correction, et al. et al, No. 3:2016cv00384 - Document 16 (S.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 -The Report and Recommendations docketed on August 7, 2017 15 is ADOPTED in full, Interested Party, The State of Ohio's Motion to Dismiss 9 is DENIED without prejudice to renewal; P laintiff's Motion to Withdraw Suit Against Defendants in Their Individual Capacities 12 is GRANTED as unopposed; Plaintiff's Motion for an Order directing the U.S. Marshal to Effect Service 12 is GRANTED; and the Clerk of Court is direc ted to immediately forward to the U.S. Marshal the forms required to effect service, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to forthwith effect service. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 8-22-2017. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Williams v. Ohio Department of Rehab and Correction, et al. et al Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON MELODY L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, vs. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 3:16cv00384 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #15), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations docketed on August 7, 2017 (Doc. #15) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Interested Party, The State of Ohio’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #9) is DENIED without prejudice to renewal; 3. Plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw Suit Against Defendants in Their Individual Capacities (Doc. #12) is GRANTED as unopposed; Dockets.Justia.com 4. Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order directing the U.S. Marshal to Effect Service (Doc. #12) is GRANTED; and 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to immediately forward to the U.S. Marshal the forms required to effect service, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to forthwith effect service. August 22, 2017 *s/Thomas M. Rose _______________________ Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.