Holsopple v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2016cv00329 - Document 15 (S.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. # 14 ) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiffs favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties stipulation; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court granting 14 Motion to Remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 4/24/17. (pb)
Download PDF
Holsopple v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON KIMBERLY HOLSOPPLE, Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. : Case No. 3:16-cv-329 : : Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : (by full consent of the parties) : : : : : : : DECISION AND ENTRY This social security case is presently before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand. (Doc. #14). The parties move that the Court remand this case for further proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Council will vacate the findings in the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) decision and the Commissioner will conduct further proceedings and develop the administrative record as necessary to determine anew whether Plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties’ Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. #14) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff’s favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; Dockets.Justia.com 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties’ stipulation; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: April 24, 2017 s/Sharon L. Ovington Sharon L. Ovington United State Magistrate Judge 2