Prado v. Thomas et al, No. 3:2016cv00306 - Document 75 (S.D. Ohio 2019)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 57 ) AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS ON QUALIFIED IMMUNITY GROUNDS EXCEPT PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM AGAINST THOMAS ON ALLEGED EXCESSIVE FORCE CLAIM WHICH IS SUSTAINED ON OTHER GROUN DS; TERMINATION ENTRY- For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. # 57 , is SUSTAINED as to all Defendants on qualified immunity grounds except Plaintiff's claim against Thomas on the alleged excessive fo rce claim which is SUSTAINED on other grounds. Judgment shall be entered in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff. The captioned case is hereby terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division at Dayton. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 3/20/19. (kma)

Download PDF
Prado v. Thomas et al Doc. 75 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.