Ammons v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2015cv00387 - Document 12 (S.D. Ohio 2016)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY granting 11 Joint Motion to Remand - The parties' Joint Motion to Remand 11 is GRANTED, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff's favor under Fed.R. Civ. P. 58, this matter is REMANDED to the So cial Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties stipulation; and the case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 6-20-2016. (de)

Download PDF
Ammons v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON CHRISTOPHER D. AMMONS, Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. : Case No. 3:15-cv-387 : : District Judge Thomas M. Rose : : Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : : : : DECISION AND ENTRY This social security case is presently before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion For Remand. (Doc. #11). The parties stipulate and petition the Court to remand this case under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and to enter Judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. The parties agree that upon remand, the Administrative Law Judge will reevaluate claimant’s vertigo, headaches, and hearing problems and assign appropriate limitations for these conditions. The Administrative Law Judge will reassess the medical opinions and claimant’s subjective symptoms and issue a new decision. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties’ Joint Motion to Remand (Doc. #11) is GRANTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff’s favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties’ stipulation; and Dockets.Justia.com 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Monday, June 20, 2016. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.