Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2015cv00131 - Document 14 (S.D. Ohio 2016)

Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Commissioner's non-disability determination is found unsupported by substantial evidence and REVERSED, this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under Sentence Four of42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for an immediate award of benefits, and the Clerk is ORDERED to terminate this case on the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9-13-2016. (de)

Download PDF
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON MICHAEL MARTIN, Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:15-cv-131 : Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman v. : CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, : : Defendant. : ______________________________________________________________________________ DECISION AND ENTRY ______________________________________________________________________________ This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff Michael Martin’s application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. On August 2, 2016, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11), which recommended that the Court reverse the Commissioner’s non-disability finding and remand the matter to the Social Security Administration for the payment of benefits. On August 19, 2016, the Commissioner filed Objections (Doc. 12) to the Report and Recommendation. On September 2, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Response (Doc. 13) to the Commissioner’s Objections. This matter is therefore ripe for the Court’s review. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that the Commissioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: 1. The Commissioner’s non-disability determination is found unsupported by substantial evidence and REVERSED; Dockets.Justia.com 2. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for an immediate award of benefits; and 3. The Clerk is ORDERED to terminate this case on the Court’s docket. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Tuesday, September 13, 2016. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.