Rodriguez v. Social Security Administration, No. 3:2014cv00463 - Document 13 (S.D. Ohio 2015)

Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS -The Report and Recommendations filed on November 19, 2015 12 is ADOPTED in full, no finding is made as to whether Plaintiff Efrain Rodriguez was under a disability within the meaning of the S ocial Security Act, this case is remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further consideration consistent with the Report and Recommendations and the instant Decision and Entry; and the case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12-8-2015. (de)

Download PDF
Rodriguez v. Social Security Administration Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON EFRAIN RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, : : Case No. 3:14cv00463 vs. : CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. : District Judge Thomas M. Rose Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #12), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on November 19, 2015 (Doc. #12) is ADOPTED in full; 2. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff Efrain Rodriguez was under a “disability” within the meaning of the Social Security Act; 3. This case is remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further consideration Consistent with the Report and Recommendations and the instant Decision and Entry; and Dockets.Justia.com 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. December 8, 2015 *s/Thomas M. Rose _______________________ Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.