Easterling v. Crawford, No. 3:2014cv00226 - Document 42 (S.D. Ohio 2015)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON SECOND MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (DOC. # 40 ); OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (D0C. # 41 ) AND PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION FOR RE LIEF OF JUDGMENT (RULE 60B)" (DOC. # 39 ) - Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz in his September 23, 2015, Report and Recommendations on Second Motion for Relief from Ju dgment (Doc. # 40 ), as well as on a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, the Court ADOPTS said judicial filing. Plaintiff's Objections thereto (Doc. # 41 ) are OVERRULED for reasons previously explained. See Docs. ## 36 , 38 . Plaintiff's "Motion for Relief of Judgment (Rule 60B)" (Doc. # 39 ) isOVERRULED. The above-captioned case shall remain terminated on this Court'sdocket. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/19/2015. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)