Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al, No. 3:2013cv00115 - Document 812 (S.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT DEFENDANT THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT RECORD (DOC. # 802 )- Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Supplement Defendant The Sherwin-WilliamsCompany's Summ ary Judgment Record, Doc. #802, by including Sherwin- Williams' Answers and Supplemental Answers to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories No. 5 and No. 6. As Sherwin-Williams notes, however, these Answers were identified and marked as exhibits at Sco tt Thomas's deposition and were filed with the Court as Doc. #678, PagelD##11017-18. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion to Supplement The Sherwin-Williams Company's Summary Judgment Record, Doc. # 802 , is OVERRULED AS MOOT.Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/27/17. (kma)