Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al, No. 3:2013cv00115 - Document 189 (S.D. Ohio 2014)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING THE "RES JUDICATA DEFENDANTS'" MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT OR ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL (DOC. # 99 ), AND DEFENDANT THE DAYTON POWER & LIGHT COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I (" ;MIGRATION CLAIM") OF THE COMPLAINT (DOC. # 138 ); SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: CERTAIN DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. # 100 ); DEFENDANT L.M. BERRY AND CO. LLC'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEA DINGS, JOINDER IN OTHER DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS AND ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR STAY (DOC. # 115 ); DEFENDANT REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS CO.'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, JOINDER IN OTHER DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS, AND ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR STA Y (DOC. # 118 ); MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANT NEWMARK LLC (DOC. # 157 ); MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANT LA MIRADA PRODUCTS CO., INC. (DOC. # 164 ); DEFENDANT FICKERT DEVCO, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. # 168 ). Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 02/18/14. (pb1)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.