Avis Rent A Car System et al v. City of Dayton, Ohio, No. 3:2012cv00399 - Document 81 (S.D. Ohio 2013)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY DISMISSING, WITH PREJUDICE, COUNT TWO OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. # 65 IN 3:12-CV-399) OF PLAINTIFFS AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC AND BUDGET RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC.; DISMISSING, WITH PREJUDICE, COUNT TWO OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. # 37 IN 3:12-CV- 405) OF PLAINTIFFS ENTERPRISE RAC COMPANY OF CINCINNATI, LLC DBA ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR AND VANGUARD CAR RENTAL USA, LLC DBA NATIONAL AND ALAMO; DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY FEES, WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS F ROM DATE, UNDER RULE 54(d)(2) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE; MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY FEES TO BE RESOLVED AFTER ANTICIPATED APPEAL WITH NO BRIEFING AND NO QUANTIFICATION OF AMOUNT OF REQUESTED FEES OR HOURS EXPENDED AT THIS TIME; CONSOLIDATING, UNDER RULE 42(a)(2) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, CASE NO. 3:12-CV-399 AND CASE NO. 3:12-CV-405; THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO FILE ALL FUTURE MATTERS IN CASE NO. 3:12-CV-399; CASE NO. 3:12-CV-405 ORDERED ADMINISTRATIVELY PROCESSED; JUDGEMENT TO ENTER AS SET FORTH HEREIN, FOLLOWING FILING OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES; DIRECTIVE TO COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 8/22/2013. (jdf1)