O'Malley v. NaphCare Inc, No. 3:2012cv00326 - Document 40 (S.D. Ohio 2014)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING THE PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT OF DEFENDANT NAPHCARE, INC. (DOC. #24), AND SUSTAINING THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT OF DEFENDANTS JEFF MciNTYRE AND KARINA CARLISLE (DOC. #33); PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM UNDER THE OHIO WHISTLEBLOWER'S PROTECTION ACT, OHIO REV. CODE § 4113.52 (COUNT ONE), AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM UNDER THE AGE DISCRIMINAT ION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT, 29 U.S.C. § 623 (COUNT FOUR), AGAINST DEFENDANTS McINTYRE AND CARLISLE ONLY IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; ALL OTHER CLAIMS AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFF GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT W ITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS TO REPLEAD CLAIMS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ALL AMENDMENTS MUST TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE STRICTURES OF RULE 11 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 2/28/2014. (gh1) Modified text for clarity on 2/28/2014 (tt).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.