Hobart Corporation et al v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. et al, No. 3:2012cv00213 - Document 34 (S.D. Ohio 2013)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT DAYTON POWER & LIGHT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 121 IN CASE NO. 3:10-CV-195); SUSTAINING DEFENDANT CARGILL, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 139 IN CASE NO. 3:10-CV-195); SUSTAI NING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. # 12 IN CASE NO. 3: 12-CV-213); OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. # 124 IN CASE NO. 3:10-CV-195); DISMISSING AS MOOT ALL COUNTERCLAIMS AND CROSSCLAIMS FI LED IN CASE NO. 3:10-CV-195; OVERRULING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVINGTON'S MARCH 23, 2012, DECISION AND ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO QUASH (DOC. # 109 IN CASE NO. 3:10- CV-195); OVERRULING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY (DOC. # 122 IN CASE NO. 3:10-CV-195), AND OVERRULING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC. # 127 IN CASE NO. 3:10-CV-195); JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS IN CASES 3:10-CV-195 AND 3: 12-CV-213; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 02/08/13. (pb1)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.