Candler v. Commissioner Social Security, No. 3:2012cv00181 - Document 13 (S.D. Ohio 2013)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on August 2, 2013 (Doc. # 12 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. The Commissioner's final non-disability decision is reversed; 3. Plaintiff Kenneth A. Cand ler's case is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for payment of Disability Insurance Benefits, consistent with the Social Security Act, based on the disability onset date of June 5, 2007; and, 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 08/20/13. (pb1)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON KENNETH A. CANDLER, : Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:12cv000181 vs. : CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. : District Judge Thomas M. Rose Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #12), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on August 2, 2013 (Doc. #12) is ADOPTED in full; 2. The Commissioner s final non-disability decision is reversed; 3. Plaintiff Kenneth A. Candler s case is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for payment of Disability Insurance Benefits, consistent with the Social Security Act, based on the disability onset date of June 5, 2007; and, 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. August 20, 2013 s/Thomas M. Rose _______________________ Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
