Mack v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2012cv00115 - Document 20 (S.D. Ohio 2014)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS -The Report and Recommendations filed on September 4, 2014 19 is ADOPTED in full, the Motion For Allowance Of Attorney Fees 18 is GRANTED, the Commissioner is directed to pay Plaintiff's attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) in the total amount of $22,000.00, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to reimburse Plaintiff the amount of EAJA fees $6,950.00 previously awarded to counsel and the case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 9-24-2014. (de)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON SHIRLEY MACK, : Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:12cv00115 vs. : CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. : District Judge Thomas M. Rose Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #19), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on September 4, 2014 (Doc. #19) is ADOPTED in full; 2. The Motion For Allowance Of Attorney Fees (Doc. #18) is GRANTED; 3. The Commissioner is directed to pay Plaintiff s attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) in the total amount of $22,000.00; 4. Plaintiff s counsel is directed to reimburse Plaintiff the amount of EAJA fees $6,950.00 previously awarded to counsel; and 5. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. September 24, 2014 *s/Thomas M. Rose _________________________ Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
