Bowsheir v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, No. 3:2011cv00302 - Document 8 (S.D. Ohio 2014)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 in full, Jeffrey T. Bowshiers Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DENIED and DISMISSED, Petitioner is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis and any requested certificate of appealability and this case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 1-28-2014. (de)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JEFFREY T. BOWSHIER,1 : Petitioner, : : vs. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Case No. 3:11cv00302 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : Respondent. : DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #7), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on January 7, 2014 (Doc. #7) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Jeffrey T. Bowshier s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1) is DENIED and DISMISSED; 3. Petitioner is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis and any requested certificate of appealability; and, 1 State records indicate that Petitioner s last name is spelled Bowshier, which is slightly different than the spelling in his habeas Petitioner. E.g., Doc. #1, PageID at 18-51. Despite this, there is no issue that both this case and the state records submitted by Respondent concern Petitioner Jeffrey T. Bowshier. 4. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court. January 28, 2014 *s/THOMAS M. ROSE _______________________ Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
