Martin v. Dobson, No. 3:2009cv00208 - Document 11 (S.D. Ohio 2010)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON FEBRUARY 5, 2010 10 ; DISMISSING PLAINTIFF MARK MARTIN'S COMPLAINT; DISMISSING DEFENDANT DANIEL DOBSON'S COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD PARTY CLAIMS; AND TERMINATING THE CASE ON THE DOCKET OF THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 2/24/2010. (jwd1)
Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF omo WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON MARK MARTIN, Plaintiff, Case No.3 :09cvOO208 vs. District Judge Walter Herbert Rice Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington DANffiL DOBSON, Defendant. DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON FEBRUARY 5, 2010 (Doc. #10); DISMISSING PLAINTIFF MARK MARTIN'S COMPLAINT; DISMISSING DEFENDANT DANIEL DOBSON'S COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD PARTY CLAIMS; AND TERMINATING THE CASE ON mE DOCKET OF TIDS COURT The Court has conducted a de novo review ofthe Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. # I 0), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that: l. The Report and Recommendations filed on February 5,2010 (Doc. #10) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiff Mark Martin's Complaint is DISMISSED; 3. Defendant Daniel Dobson's Counterclaims and Third Party Claims are DISMISSED; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket ofthis Court. Walter Herbert Rice United States District Judge