Guo et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al, No. 3:2008cv00139 - Document 16 (S.D. Ohio 2009)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN FULL THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON DECEMBER 18, 2008 (Doc. 15 ); GRANTING DEFENDANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 14 ) AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT; DENYING AS MOOT THE REMAINING PENDING MOTIONS (Doc. #s 5 , 13 ); AND TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE DOCKET OF THE COURT. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 1-13-2009. (jdf1)

Download PDF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JIUSHENG GUO, et aI., Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:08cv00139 District Judge Walter Herbert Rice Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington vs. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et aI., Defendants. DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN FULL THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON DECEMBER 18, 2008 (Doc. #15); GRANTING DEFENDANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. #14) AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT; DENYING AS MOOT THE REMAINING PENDING MOTIONS (Doc. #s 5, 13); AND TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE DOCKET OF THE COURT The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #15), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS in full said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on December 18, 2008 (Doc. #15) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Defendants' Supplemental Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #14) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED as moot; 3. The remaining pending Motions (Doc. #5, 13) are DENIED as moot; and 4. This case is terminated on the docket of the Court. Walter Herbert Rice United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.