Taylor v. Waler et al, No. 3:2007cv00454 - Document 34 (S.D. Ohio 2009)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN FULL THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON JANUARY 15, 2009 (Doc. 32 ); DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 23 ); DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 20 ). Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 2/3/2009. (sc1, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON RASU TAYLOR, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:07-cv-454 District Judge Walter Herbert Rice Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington vs. SHAWN F. WALER, et al., Defendants. DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN FULL THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON JANUARY 15, 2009 (Doc. #32); DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. #23); DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. #20) The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovinglon (Doc. #32), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS in full said Report and Recommendations. II is therefore ORDERED that: I. The Report and Recommendations filed On January 15, 2009 (Doc. #32) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Defendants' Motion for Swnrnary Judgment (Doc. #23) is DENIED as moot; and 3. Defendants' Motion fOT Summary Judgment (Doc. #20) is DENIED without prejudice. Walter Herbert Rice United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
