Wells Fargo Bank NA v. LaSalle Bank National Association, No. 3:2007cv00449 - Document 276 (S.D. Ohio 2009)
Court Description: DECISION REGARDING DESIGNATIONS IN THE DEPOSITION OF JULIE GOODMAN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 10/6/2009. (kpf1)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:07-cv-449 -vs- Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz : LaSALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant. DECISION REGARDING DESIGNATIONS IN THE DEPOSITION OF JULIE GOODMAN This case is before the Court on the parties request that the Court rule in limine on the admission of designated and cross-designated portions of depositions to be played at trial from edited videorecordings of the depositions. The background for the procedure to be followed is set forth in the Decision and Order Vacating Trial Date (Doc. No. 229). Rulings on the depositions will be issued as completed so that the video editing process can be started as needed. The Court rules on the objections made in the Chart (attachment to Doc. No. 225) as corrected pursuant to Doc. Nos. 226 and 231, and as further clarified by the Appendix1 to Doc. No. 192 as subsequently numbered in Attorney Marx s email of 8/12/2009 (12:11 P.M.), as follows: p. 22, ll. 12-20 LaSalle s objection is overruled p. 45, l. 23 to p. 46, l. 24 Wells Fargo s objection is sustgained. 1 Both the numbered and unnumbered versions of this Appendix are now filed and docketed in the case for future reference at Doc. No. 241. 1 p. 48, l. 8 to p. 51, l. 6 The objections of both parties are sustained. p. 51, l. 21 to p. 52, l. 5 LaSalle s objection is sustained. p. 54, l. 15 to p. 55, l. 1 The objections of both parties are sustained. p. 76, l. 14 to p. 79, l. 1. LaSalle s objection is overruled. p. 80, l. 6 to p. 81, l. 13 LaSalle s objection is overruled. p. 134, l. 6 to p. 137, l. 15 LaSalle s objection is overruled through line 5 on p. 135; the balance of LaSalle s objection is sustained. p. 138, ll. 7-10 LaSalle s objection is sustained. p. 140, l. 12 to p. 141, l. 6 The objections of both parties are overruled. p. 149, l. 1 to p. 150, l. 11 The objections of both parties are overruled. October 6, 2009. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
