Wells Fargo Bank NA v. LaSalle Bank National Association, No. 3:2007cv00449 - Document 153 (S.D. Ohio 2009)

Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL - Plaintiff's Motion to Compel production of a document referred to as the Property Condition Assessment Guidelines (Doc. No. 66) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/14/2009. (kopf1, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:07-cv-449 -vs- Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz : LaSALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL This case is before the Court on Plaintiff s Motion to Compel production of a document referred to as the Property Condition Assessment Guidelines (Doc. No. 66). Defendant filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 68). Plain tiff has filed no reply memorandum in support and the time for doing so expired January 2, 2009. In its Response, Defendant asserts that the Property Condition Assessment Guidelines are not responsive to Request No. 1 of Plaintiff s Fifth Request for the Production of Documents. In that the Request Plaintiff called for All LaSalle manuals, guidebooks, or analogous compilations of documents concerning internal procedures for the underwriting and/or origination of commercial loans that were in effect at the time the Loans were being underwritten and originated. (Quoted at Motion, Doc. No. 66, at 2.) Defendant asserts that these Guidelines did not concern internal procedures, but were in fact directed to outside evaluators. In addition, Defendant notes that no witness has testified these Guidelines were in effect at the time the loans in suit were being 1 underwritten and originated. Plaintiff makes no response to these two assertions and the Court therefore accepts them as made. On that basis, the Motion to Compel is not well taken and is therefore DENIED. April 14, 2009. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.