Svete v. Cherneskey Heyman & Kress, P.L.L et al, No. 3:2007cv00197 - Document 70 (S.D. Ohio 2009)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY - It is therefore ORDERED that:1.The Report and Recommendations filed on November 24, 2009 69 is ADOPTED in full; 2. Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment 54 is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiffs Motion to Compel 62 and Plaintiffs Pro Se Motion For Continuance Pursuant To Rule 56(f) 65 are DENIED; 4. Plaintiffs Motion For Ruling On Two Motions Pending Before The Court 60 is DENIED as moot; 5. Plaintiff's Motion For The Court To Direct United States Marshals To Serve Remaining Unserved Defendants 61 is DENIED as moot; and 6. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 12/16/2009. (jwd1)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON DAVID W. SVETE, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:07cv00197 vs. CHERNESKEY HEYMAN & KRESS, et al., District Judge Walter Herbert Rice Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington Defendants. DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has conducted a ~ novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #69), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS in full said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on November 24, 2009 (Doc. #69) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. #54) is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (Doc. #62) and Plaintiffs Pro Se Motion For Continuance Pursuant To Rule 56(f) (Doc. #65) are DENIED; 4. Plaintiffs Motion For Ruling On Two Motions Pending Before The Court (Doc. #60) is DENIED as moot; 5. Plaintiff's Motion For The Court To Direct United States Marshals To Serve Remaining Unserved Defendants (Doc. #61) is DENIED as moot; and 6. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Walter Herbert Rice United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
