Sanders v. Addison, No. 3:2007cv00103 - Document 25 (S.D. Ohio 2009)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN FULL THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON MARCH 27, 2009 24 ; GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES 20 and 21 ; ENTERING JUDGMENT FOR ATTORNEY FEES IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT IN THE AMOUNT $3,516.74; AND MAINTAINING THE TERMINATION OF THIS CASE ON THE DOCKET OF THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 4/22/2009. (davisj1, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON DONALD SANDERS, d/b/a VACA RESOURCES, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:07cv00103 District Judge Walter Herbert Rice Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington JOHN ADDISON, d/b/a AVS VIDEO PRODUCTIONS, LLC, Defendant. DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN FULL THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON MARCH 27, 2009 (Doc. #24); GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES (Doc. #s 20, 21); ENTERING JUDGMENT FOR ATTORNEY FEES IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT IN THE AMOUNT $3,516.74; AND MAINTAINING THE TERMINATION OF THIS CASE ON THE DOCKET OF THIS COURT The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #24), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.c. ยง636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS in full said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on March 27,2009 (Doc. #24) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. #s 20, 21) is GRANTED; 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment for attorney fees in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of$3,516.74; and 4. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Walter Herbert Rice United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
