Burley v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2024cv04305 - Document 11 (S.D. Ohio 2025)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties' Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. No. 10 ) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff's favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; 3 . This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties' Motion; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry on 3/6/2025. (acw)

Download PDF
Burley v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION STEPHANIE B., Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. : Case No. 2:24-cv-04305 : : Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry : (by full consent of the parties) : : : : : : DECISION AND ENTRY This Social Security case is presently before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. No. 10). The parties agree that this Court should enter a judgment remanding the matter to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties further agree that upon remand, the Appeals Council will remand the matter to an Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings and the claim will be completely reevaluated starting at the beginning of the sequential evaluation, including offering Plaintiff a new hearing. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties’ Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. No. 10) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff’s favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. Dockets.Justia.com § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties’ Motion; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Caroline H. Gentry Caroline H. Gentry United States Magistrate Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.