Close et al v. Eldo Organic, LLC et al, No. 2:2022cv01630 - Document 25 (S.D. Ohio 2022)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER - Plaintiffs are ORDERED to file their response to 17 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, if any, WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 5/31/2022. (jk) Modified document type on 5/31/2022 (tla).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Close et al v. Eldo Organic, LLC et al Doc. 25 Case: 2:22-cv-01630-MHW-EPD Doc #: 25 Filed: 05/31/22 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 265 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Stephen Close, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:22-cv-1630 V. Judge Michael H. Watson Eldo Organic, LLC, et al., Magistrate Judge Deavers Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Defendants move to dismiss the Complaint for lack of jurisdiction. EOF No. 17. Plaintiffs move for leave to amend their Complaint, ECF No. 23, but have not responded to Defendants' motion. The Court is concerned about the jurisdictional issues raised in Defendants' motion and wishes to assure itself of its jurisdiction before ruling on Plaintiffs' motion or otherwise proceeding with the case. Given the complicated nature of the issues In Defendants' motion, the Court would benefit from Plaintiffs' responses to the same. Accordingly, Plaintiffs are ORDERED to file their response to Defendants' motion, if any, WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS. No further extensions of time shall be given. Briefing on Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend is STAYED until further notice. IT IS SO ORDERED. MICHAEL H. WATSON,JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
