Kirby v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2020cv03441 - Document 20 (S.D. Ohio 2021)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The decision of the Commissioner denying disability benefits in this case is AFFIRMED. Judgment shall be rendered in favor of the Commissioner and this case is hereby terminated. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 9/9/2021. (tb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Kirby v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 20 Case: 2:20-cv-03441-SDM-EPD Doc #: 20 Filed: 09/09/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 2716 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN OHIO DISTRICT EASTERN DIVISION LISA A. KIRBY, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:20-cv-3441 Judge Sarah D. Morrison Magistrate Judge Preston Deavers v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Objections filed by the Plaintiff, Lisa A. Kirby, (ECF No. 19) to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Commissioner denying benefits be affirmed (ECF No. 18). Pursuant to Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, after a de novo and careful determination of the record, the Court concludes that the decision of the Commissioner “is supported by substantial evidence and was made pursuant to proper legal standards.” Rogers v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 486 F. 3d 234, 241 (6th Cir. 2007). The issues raised in the Plaintiff’s Objections have been considered and correctly addressed by the Magistrate Judge. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The decision of the Commissioner denying disability benefits in this case is 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case: 2:20-cv-03441-SDM-EPD Doc #: 20 Filed: 09/09/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 2717 AFFIRMED. Judgment shall be rendered in favor of the Commissioner, and this case shall be TERMINATED from the Court’s docket records. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/Sarah D. Morrison SARAH D. MORRISON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
