Boyd v. Chillicothe Correctional Institution, No. 2:2017cv01003 - Document 10 (S.D. Ohio 2018)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER - re 9 The Court overrules in part and sustains in part Plaintiff's objection (ECF No. 9). Plaintiff's due process claims are dismissed, but his First Amendment retaliation claim may proceed. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 4/23/2018. (cmw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Boyd v. Chillicothe Correctional Institution Doc. 10 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.