Patel v. Aetna, et al, No. 2:2017cv00078 - Document 50 (S.D. Ohio 2018)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' 37 Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's claims is GRANTED. Because the Court finds the ALIC dropped its counterclaims by filing the Amended Answer, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's 33 and De fendants' 37 Motion for Summary Judgment on those claims as well as Defendants' motion for summary judgment on the improvidently filed "counterclaim to the counterclaim." Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 12/12/2018. (er)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Patel v. Aetna, et al Doc. 50 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.