White v. Newkirk, No. 2:2016cv01142 - Document 10 (S.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 9 and find it restates the allegations set forth in the original complaint and fails to correct the deficiencies identified by the Magistrate Judge in her Report and Recom mendation. The Court therefore adopts 3 the Magistrate Judge's 12/07/16 Report and Recommendation. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Complaint [1-1] is DISMISSED and Plaintiff's Motion to Amend 6 is denied on grounds of futility. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 02/21/2017. (dh1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Download PDF
White v. Newkirk Doc. 10 Dockets.Justia.com