Wilson et al v. Chagrin Valley Steel Erectors, Inc., No. 2:2016cv01084 - Document 45 (S.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER granting 37 Chagrin Valley Steel Erector's 56(d) Motion. Chagrin Valley has sufficiently demonstrated how the materials it hopes to obtain with further discovery would help it oppose summary judgment. However, discovery cl osed nearly one month prior to Plaintiffs and Third-Party Defendant filing their Motion for Summary Judgment. It is unclear whether Chagrin Valley is entitled to the discovery it seeks, or whether it is appropriately discoverable information. Wheth er Chagrin Valley's discovery request is meritorious will be determined by Magistrate Judge Jolson. Until her decision, the Court HOLDS IN ABEYANCE the Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiffs and Third-Party Defendant Justin Helmick. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 10/10/2017. (dh1)
Download PDF
Wilson et al v. Chagrin Valley Steel Erectors, Inc. Doc. 45 Dockets.Justia.com