Clark v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al, No. 2:2016cv00413 - Document 8 (S.D. Ohio 2017)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying (4) Motion to Amend/Correct; adopting Report and Recommendations re (6) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:16-cv-00413-JLG-KAJ in case 2:16-cv-00414-JLG-KAJ. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 3/17/2017. Associated Cases: 2:16-cv-00204-JLG-KAJ, 2:16-cv-00413-JLG-KAJ, 2:16-cv-00414-JLG-KAJ (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Clark v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LEODIUS CLARK, CASE NO. 2:16-CV-00204 2:16-CV-00413 2:16-CV-00414 JUDGE JAMES L. GRAHAM Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson Petitioner, v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, et al., Respondents. OPINION AND ORDER On February 6, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) be granted, that Petitioner’s Motion to Amend (ECF No. 19) be denied, that Petitioner’s Motion to Stay Proceedings (ECF No. 18) be denied, and that this consolidated action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. (ECF No. 22.) Petitioner has filed an Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 23.) Petitioner objects to all of the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations, with the exception of the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that his request for monetary damages be denied. Petitioner again raises all of the same arguments he previously presented. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court has conducted a de novo review. For the reasons already well detailed in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s Objection (ECF No. 23) is OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Petitioner’s Motion to Amend (ECF No. 19) is DENIED. Petitioner’s Motion to Stay Proceedings (ECF No. 18) is DENIED. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. Dockets.Justia.com IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: March 17, 2017 _______s/James L. Graham JAMES L. GRAHAM United States District Judge 2 _
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
